1.The taking of innocent life is called murder.
2.Take
a look at the pictures of aborted babies, murdered babies, lying
without legs or arms, in a pile of blood with their little fingers and
face features in pain, or listen to what an ex-abortionist doctor says
about when they were doing the "PROCEDURE", and how the baby moved away
and tried to hide in the walls of the uterus, or that its head moved
when the aborted baby was placed a few
seconds still alive in the lab desk. Such direct evidence is very powerful
3.Abortion is not a matter of choice, it's a matter of life and how we value life.
4.Life begins at conception.
5.No
clearly defined point at which to state an embryo is human or is not
has ever been empirically established by pro-abortionists.
6.Abortion takes away the right of a human being to live.
7.Pro-abortionists
like to say that the child is only a "potential" human. That the child
IS something is obvious. Calling her a "potential" human doesn't say
what she is, it
only
speaks to what she will be. I have never heard a pro-abortionist say
what the child IS. The reason for that is obvious. They know the answer
and that answer is that the child is human. No person or animal has ever
been observed to change into some other kind of creature during their
lifetime. If something is a cat, it has always been a cat, and will
always be a cat. If someone is a human being then they
have always been and will always be a human being.
8.Unborn
persons are dependent on their mothers for survival just as newborn
babies and young children are, and indeed, as many elderly and ill
persons are. Being dependent does not make one not human or not a
person.
9.Having
the freedom to choose whether or not an unborn person is to be killed
is not a right which can be justified morally or legally. No person has
right to destroy the life of another person.
10.The
unborn person is human and physically distinct from the mother and not
just part of her own body. The unborn child often has a blood type
different from that of the mother. If the differing blood types were to
mix, one or both of the mother and child could die. Half of all babies
are male. During the pregnancy, is the mother temporarily part male?
Without the protection provided by the amniotic
sac
the unborn child would be expelled from the mother's body as a foreign
object. Clearly, the unborn child IS IN the mother's body but IS NOT
PART of the mother's body.
11.Just
because every child may not be wanted by their parents, is not reason
enough to justify killing the child because parents have a
responsibility for the life they
helped
to create, and because an unborn person has a right to live which
outweighs another person’s right to kill and to avoid raising a child
they created.
12.
It is a fallacy to argue that pro-life laws are an effort to legislate
morality since all laws are passed to restrict or encourage behavior,
and hence have some kind of
moral view of the world being promoted.
13.Pro-abortionists
argue that abortion should be allowed in cases of rape and incest.
Again, a quick answer is "Why?" A woman who has been raped will not be
'unraped' after an abortion. Abortion will not take away the incestuous
violation of a young girl. In fact, in the case of incest, abortion
helps protect the abuser by helping to hide his crime. Secondly, when
rapists are jailed, we do not also jail their children. Killing a child
who is a product of rape or incest punishes the child. It does not
punish the rapist or abuser. No civilized society punishes a child with
death because of the sins of their parents. I can understand that a
woman who is pregnant due to rape or incest may not want the child.
However, killing the child just puts the woman in the position of
responding to violence with another act of violence. There are millions
of couples eager to adopt babies. There are couples willing to adopt any
baby, not just healthy white babies. This allows the woman to not have
to forever be reminded of her violation without having to live with the
physical and psychological consequences of abortion.
14.The
truth is that no conclusive evidence has been provided which proves
that an unborn baby is not a person. Since the number of cases
concerning the abortion issue involves millions of lives, no sane or
humane society would risk committing millions of murders.
15.Pro-abortionists
argue that abortion should be allowed in cases of severe 'fetal
deformities'. Words are powerful weapons. When we want to provoke
feelings of compassion we speak of 'handicapped children.' When we
want
to advocate killing we speak of 'fetal deformities.' Since when do we
deal with a person’s physical problems by killing them? If that is the
case then why not advocate burning down all of the nation's nursing
homes with the residents still inside? A second consideration is that
many forms of prenatal testing for handicaps are flawed and unreliable.
Do we risk killing a baby for an ailment that
she may not really have?
No comments:
Post a Comment